Enterprise Integration Patterns: Building Connected Systems
Introduction
Enterprise systems don’t exist in isolation. Customer data flows from CRM to billing. Orders trigger inventory updates and shipping notifications. Financial transactions consolidate for reporting. Integration is the connective tissue of enterprise IT.

Yet integration often becomes the most painful part of enterprise architecture. Point-to-point connections proliferate. Changes in one system cascade unexpectedly. Data inconsistencies appear. Integration debt accumulates faster than technical debt in application code.
Understanding integration patterns helps CTOs build connected systems that remain manageable as complexity grows.
Why Integration Matters
Business Drivers
Process Automation
- End-to-end workflow automation
- Reduced manual handoffs
- Faster process completion
- Lower error rates
Data Consistency
- Single source of truth
- Real-time synchronisation
- Consolidated reporting
- Accurate analytics
Agility
- Faster change implementation
- Easier system replacement
- Reduced coupling
- Composable capabilities
Customer Experience
- Seamless channel transitions
- Consistent information
- Real-time updates
- Personalisation enablement

Common Integration Challenges
Complexity Growth
Point-to-point integrations grow exponentially:
- 10 systems: 45 potential connections
- 20 systems: 190 potential connections
- 50 systems: 1,225 potential connections
Without governance, integration becomes unmanageable.
Technology Diversity
Enterprises accumulate varied technologies:
- Legacy systems with dated interfaces
- Cloud services with modern APIs
- Package applications with vendor APIs
- Custom applications with custom protocols
Integration must bridge this diversity.
Change Impact
Tightly coupled integration means:
- Changes cascade across systems
- Testing scope expands
- Risk increases
- Velocity decreases
Data Quality
Integration exposes data problems:
- Inconsistent formats
- Missing data
- Duplicate records
- Semantic differences
Integration Styles
File Transfer
How It Works
Systems exchange data through files:
- Export from source system
- File transfer (FTP, cloud storage)
- Import to target system
When to Use
- Batch processing acceptable
- Large data volumes
- Legacy system limitations
- Loose timing requirements
Considerations
- Latency inherent in batch
- Error handling complexity
- File format dependencies
- Monitoring challenges
Shared Database
How It Works
Multiple systems access common database:
- Shared tables for common data
- Each system reads/writes directly
- Database enforces consistency
When to Use
- Rarely recommended
- Legacy situations
- Tightly coupled applications
- Same vendor applications
Considerations

- Tight coupling
- Schema change impact
- Performance contention
- Vendor lock-in
Remote Procedure Call
How It Works
Systems call each other directly:
- Synchronous request-response
- Tight coupling between caller and callee
- Real-time data access
When to Use
- Real-time data needed
- Simple integrations
- Internal services
- Read-heavy patterns
Considerations
- Synchronous coupling
- Availability dependencies
- Error handling complexity
- Potential for cascading failures
Messaging
How It Works
Systems communicate through messages:
- Asynchronous message passing
- Message broker mediates
- Loose coupling achieved
When to Use
- Asynchronous acceptable
- Multiple consumers
- Loose coupling desired
- Event-driven architecture
Considerations
- Message delivery guarantees
- Message ordering
- Broker dependency
- Operational complexity
Integration Patterns
Message Channel
Purpose
Dedicated pathway for messages between systems.
Types
- Point-to-point: One sender, one receiver
- Publish-subscribe: One sender, many receivers
- Request-reply: Two-way communication
Implementation
- Queues for point-to-point
- Topics for publish-subscribe
- Correlation for request-reply
Message Router
Purpose
Direct messages to appropriate destinations based on content or context.
Types
- Content-based: Route on message content
- Context-based: Route on metadata
- Rules-based: Route on business rules
Use Cases
- Workload distribution
- Conditional processing
- Version routing
- Geographic routing
Message Translator
Purpose
Convert messages between formats.
Types
- Format transformation (XML to JSON)
- Schema mapping
- Protocol translation
- Enrichment
Considerations
- Transformation logic complexity
- Performance impact
- Versioning challenges
- Error handling
Message Endpoint
Purpose
Connect applications to messaging system.
Patterns
- Polling consumer: Check for messages periodically
- Event-driven consumer: React to message arrival
- Competing consumers: Multiple consumers share load
- Selective consumer: Filter messages of interest
Aggregator
Purpose
Combine related messages into single message.
Use Cases
- Batch processing
- Order assembly
- Report consolidation
- Data collection
Challenges
- Correlation logic
- Timeout handling
- Incomplete aggregation
- State management
Splitter
Purpose
Break single message into multiple messages.
Use Cases
- Parallel processing
- Routing to different systems
- Breaking batch into items
- Fan-out patterns
Content Enricher
Purpose
Add information to messages from external sources.
Use Cases
- Customer detail lookup
- Price lookup
- Inventory status
- Validation data
Considerations
- Performance impact
- Cache management
- Error handling
- Data freshness
API Strategy
API as Integration Style
Modern integration increasingly uses APIs:
Characteristics
- Standardised interfaces (REST, GraphQL)
- Documentation and discovery
- Version management
- Security standards
Benefits
- Developer experience
- Self-service integration
- Ecosystem enablement
- Reusability
API Design Principles
Consumer-Centric
- Design for consumer needs
- Consistent conventions
- Clear documentation
- Versioning strategy
Security First
- Authentication standards (OAuth 2.0)
- Authorisation granularity
- Rate limiting
- Input validation
Evolvability
- Backward compatibility
- Deprecation policies
- Version lifecycle
- Change communication
API Gateway
Capabilities
- Request routing
- Authentication/authorisation
- Rate limiting
- Transformation
- Monitoring
Benefits
- Centralised policy
- Security enforcement
- Traffic management
- Analytics
Event-Driven Architecture
Events vs Messages
Messages
- Commands or requests
- Directed to specific recipient
- Expectation of action
Events
- Facts about what happened
- Published without recipient knowledge
- No expectation of specific response
Event Patterns
Event Notification
- Minimal data in event
- Consumers query for details
- Loose coupling
Event-Carried State Transfer
- Full relevant data in event
- Consumers don’t need callbacks
- Eventual consistency
Event Sourcing
- Events as source of truth
- State derived from event history
- Complete audit trail
Event Architecture Considerations
Benefits
- Loose coupling
- Scalability
- Resilience
- Real-time capability
Challenges
- Eventual consistency
- Event ordering
- Debugging complexity
- Operational overhead
Integration Architecture
Integration Platform
Capabilities
- Connectivity: Adapters for systems
- Mediation: Transformation and routing
- Orchestration: Process coordination
- Governance: Policy enforcement
Options
- Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
- Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
- API Management platforms
- Event streaming platforms
Hybrid Integration
Modern enterprises need multiple approaches:
- APIs for synchronous access
- Events for asynchronous communication
- Files for batch processing
- Direct integration for special cases
Governance
Standards
- Naming conventions
- Data formats
- Security requirements
- Documentation requirements
Processes
- Integration request process
- Design review
- Testing requirements
- Change management
Monitoring
- Performance metrics
- Error tracking
- SLA monitoring
- Capacity planning
Implementation Considerations
Build vs Buy
Build When
- Unique requirements
- Core competency
- Competitive advantage
- Control critical
Buy When
- Standard patterns
- Time to market pressure
- Operational capability limited
- Ecosystem integration needed
Cloud Integration
Considerations
- Cloud-native integration services
- Hybrid connectivity requirements
- Multi-cloud scenarios
- Data residency
Patterns
- Cloud-based iPaaS
- API gateways (cloud-managed)
- Event streaming services
- Managed connectors
Legacy Integration
Challenges
- Dated protocols
- Limited interfaces
- Documentation gaps
- Performance constraints
Approaches
- Adapter development
- Screen scraping (last resort)
- Database integration (carefully)
- Gradual modernisation
Organisational Considerations
Integration Team
Options
- Centralised integration team
- Federated integration capability
- Centre of excellence model
- Platform team approach
Responsibilities
- Platform management
- Pattern development
- Governance enforcement
- Capability building
Skills and Capability
Technical Skills
- Integration platform expertise
- API development
- Data transformation
- System connectivity
Architecture Skills
- Integration pattern application
- Solution design
- Trade-off analysis
- Technology selection
Operating Model
Service Model
- Self-service for simple integrations
- Assisted for complex integrations
- Full-service for strategic integrations
Support Model
- Production support
- Incident response
- Performance management
- Capacity planning
Measuring Success
Technical Metrics
- Integration reliability (uptime)
- Message throughput
- Latency performance
- Error rates
Business Metrics
- Process cycle time
- Data accuracy
- Time to integrate
- Integration reuse
Governance Metrics
- Standards compliance
- Documentation completeness
- Technical debt accumulation
- Security compliance
Conclusion
Enterprise integration requires strategic thinking, not just tactical implementation. The patterns you choose, the architecture you build, and the governance you establish determine whether integration enables or constrains business agility.
Start with understanding your integration needs across the enterprise. Choose patterns appropriate to those needs. Build platforms that enable self-service where possible. Govern to prevent chaos without creating bureaucracy.
Well-designed integration becomes invisible—data flows, processes work, systems collaborate. Poorly designed integration becomes the constraint that limits everything else.