cloud cost optimization: A 2017 Strategic Perspective
The cloud cost optimization Imperative in 2017
As we navigate 2017, enterprise leaders face a critical inflection point in cloud cost optimization. The rapid evolution from service mesh emerging has created both unprecedented opportunities and complex challenges for organizations pursuing digital transformation.
This strategic analysis examines:
- Current state of cloud cost optimization in 2017
- Technology landscape and architecture patterns
- Enterprise implementation frameworks
- Strategic considerations for CTOs and technology leaders
- Future implications and competitive positioning
The insights shared here are drawn from analysis of enterprise implementations, vendor roadmaps, and strategic planning with Fortune 500 CTOs navigating similar transformations.
The 2017 Technology Landscape
Industry Context
2017 marks a significant period in enterprise technology evolution. Kubernetes 1.7 release has reshaped how organizations approach cloud cost optimization, accelerating adoption timelines and elevating strategic importance.
Key market dynamics include:
Technology Maturity: Service mesh emerging has moved from experimental to production-critical, with enterprises now deploying at scale rather than running pilots.
Vendor Ecosystem: The competitive landscape features mature offerings from major cloud providers, with Kubernetes emerging as a reference architecture for many implementations.
Skills Availability: The talent market for Kubernetes and Docker Swarm expertise has tightened, making build vs. partner decisions more strategic.
Enterprise Adoption Patterns
Analysis of 2017 implementations reveals three distinct maturity stages:
-
Early Adopters (15%): Organizations that began cloud cost optimization initiatives in previous years, now optimizing for scale and efficiency.
-
Fast Followers (45%): Enterprises currently implementing production systems, leveraging lessons learned from pioneers.
-
Evaluation Stage (40%): Organizations assessing feasibility, building business cases, and planning roadmaps for 2018 initiatives.
Understanding which stage aligns with your organization’s position is critical for realistic planning and resource allocation.
Technical Architecture Considerations
Reference Architecture for 2017
Contemporary cloud cost optimization implementations typically leverage several core components:
Compute Layer: ECS provides the foundation for most enterprise workloads in 2017. Organizations implementing cloud cost optimization are standardizing on ECS for its proven reliability and ecosystem maturity.
Integration Patterns: Lambda enables the event-driven architectures that support graphql adoption. The ability to compose loosely-coupled services has become table stakes for enterprise scalability.
Data Persistence: DynamoDB serves as the data tier for applications requiring cloud cost optimization capabilities. The tradeoff between consistency models and performance characteristics requires careful evaluation based on use case requirements.
Technology Selection Framework
When evaluating technologies for cloud cost optimization in 2017, consider:
Maturity Assessment: Kubernetes has reached production-grade status with enterprise support commitments. In contrast, EKS remain experimental and carry higher implementation risk.
Ecosystem Compatibility: Solutions that integrate seamlessly with Docker Swarm and GitLab CI reduce architectural complexity and accelerate time-to-value.
Operational Overhead: The spot instances optimization, lambda pricing drops means total cost of ownership extends beyond infrastructure spend to include operational expertise and tooling investments.
Implementation Anti-Patterns
Observations from failed 2017 implementations highlight common pitfalls:
- Adopting technologies released after 2017 without production validation
- Over-architecting for scale that won’t materialize within 18 months
- Underestimating the zero-trust beginning, secrets management focus requirements
- Selecting tools that don’t align with in-house expertise profiles
Enterprise Implementation Framework
Phase 1: Strategic Planning (Weeks 1-4)
Successful cloud cost optimization initiatives begin with rigorous strategic planning aligned to business objectives:
Executive Alignment: Secure C-suite commitment by framing cloud cost optimization in terms of competitive advantage, revenue impact, and risk mitigation rather than technical capabilities.
Scope Definition: Define a minimum viable architecture that delivers measurable business value within 6 months. Given 2017 technology maturity, attempting to “boil the ocean” leads to extended timelines and scope creep.
Technology Selection: Evaluate Kubernetes, Docker Swarm, GitLab CI against requirements. Prioritize proven solutions over cutting-edge options given the enterprise risk profile.
Team Composition: Assemble cross-functional teams including architects, engineers, and business stakeholders. For Kubernetes expertise, expect 12-16 week recruitment cycles in the 2017 talent market.
Phase 2: Proof of Concept (Weeks 5-12)
Validate technical feasibility and de-risk assumptions through focused pilots:
Architecture Validation: Implement a representative subset of the target architecture using ECS and Lambda. This proves integration patterns and identifies unforeseen complexity.
Performance Benchmarking: Establish baseline metrics for latency, throughput, and resource utilization. The spot instances optimization, lambda pricing drops in 2017 makes cost per transaction a critical planning input.
Security Validation: Validate zero-trust beginning, secrets management focus controls meet enterprise requirements. Compliance frameworks active in 2017 mandate specific technical controls that must be proven during POC.
Skills Assessment: Identify gaps in team capabilities and create training roadmaps. Service mesh emerging requires specialized knowledge that may not exist in traditional operations teams.
Phase 3: Production Deployment (Weeks 13-24)
Execute the production rollout with appropriate risk management:
Phased Rollout: Deploy to progressively larger user populations (5%, 25%, 100%) with rollback procedures validated at each stage.
Operational Readiness: Implement monitoring, alerting, and incident response procedures before production traffic. Kubernetes requires specific observability patterns that differ from legacy systems.
Change Management: Prepare business users and support teams for new workflows and interfaces. Technical excellence means nothing if adoption fails due to poor change management.
Performance Optimization: Tune configurations based on production traffic patterns. Expect 2-3 optimization cycles before achieving target efficiency metrics.
Strategic Considerations for Technology Leaders
Build vs. Partner Decision Framework
The 2017 market landscape influences the build vs. partner calculation:
Internal Development: Makes sense when cloud cost optimization represents core competitive differentiation and the organization has deep Kubernetes expertise. Expect 18-24 month development timelines with dedicated teams of 8-12 engineers.
System Integrator Partnership: Appropriate for organizations prioritizing speed-to-market and lacking specialized skills. SI partners bring proven Kubernetes and Docker Swarm implementation experience but introduce vendor dependency.
Platform Vendors: Evaluate for organizations seeking to minimize custom development. 2017 commercial offerings have matured but may constrain architectural flexibility.
Investment Priorities for 2017
Budget allocation recommendations based on 2017 market conditions:
Infrastructure (40%): ECS, Lambda, DynamoDB form the foundational layer. The spot instances optimization, lambda pricing drops means infrastructure remains the largest cost component.
Talent Development (25%): Training existing teams on Kubernetes and Docker Swarm capabilities. External recruitment in 2017 commands premium compensation given talent scarcity.
Security & Compliance (20%): Zero-trust beginning, secrets management focus requirements demand dedicated investment. Regulatory frameworks active in 2017 impose technical controls that must be architected from inception.
Innovation & Experimentation (15%): Reserved for evaluating emerging capabilities and building organizational learning. While EKS may not be production-ready in 2017, understanding trajectories informs 2018 planning.
Risk Mitigation Strategies
Enterprise-grade cloud cost optimization implementations manage several risk categories:
Technical Risk: Mitigate by selecting proven technologies (Kubernetes, Docker Swarm) over bleeding-edge options. Production validation matters more than feature completeness.
Organizational Risk: Address through executive sponsorship, cross-functional governance, and realistic timeline expectations. Service mesh emerging requires organizational change as much as technical implementation.
Vendor Risk: Evaluate through multi-sourcing strategies where feasible and ensuring exit/portability options exist. 2017 sees increasing cloud provider lock-in that must be consciously managed.
Operational Risk: Reduce via comprehensive runbooks, automated recovery procedures, and team training. The Kubernetes operational model differs significantly from traditional infrastructure.
Competitive Positioning
cloud cost optimization capabilities directly impact competitive position in 2017:
Time-to-Market: Organizations with mature cloud cost optimization implementations ship features 3-5x faster than competitors still operating traditional infrastructure.
Operational Efficiency: GraphQL adoption enabled by modern architectures reduces operational overhead by 40-60% compared to legacy approaches.
Innovation Capacity: Teams freed from infrastructure management focus on business logic and customer value rather than undifferentiated heavy lifting.
Strategic Path Forward
cloud cost optimization represents a critical capability for enterprises competing in 2017 and beyond. The technology landscape—characterized by service mesh emerging, graphql adoption, and multi-cloud strategies—provides mature building blocks for organizations ready to execute.
Immediate Next Steps
For technology leaders evaluating cloud cost optimization initiatives:
- Assess Current State: Conduct objective evaluation of existing capabilities, team skills, and infrastructure maturity
- Define Success Metrics: Establish measurable outcomes tied to business objectives rather than technical outputs
- Secure Executive Sponsorship: Frame the initiative in strategic terms that resonate with C-suite priorities
- Initiate POC: Launch a focused proof of concept using Kubernetes and Docker Swarm to validate feasibility
- Develop Talent Strategy: Address skills gaps through targeted hiring and training programs
Looking Toward 2018
The service mesh emerging trajectory suggests several developments will shape 2018 planning:
- Evolution of aws announces fargate preview
- Deeper integration between Docker Swarm and GitLab CI
- Expanded vendor ecosystem and competitive pressure driving feature velocity
- Multi-cloud strategies becoming baseline expectations rather than differentiators
Organizations that establish strong cloud cost optimization foundations in 2017 position themselves to capitalize on these developments while competitors remain mired in technical debt and organizational inertia.
The window for competitive advantage through cloud cost optimization is narrowing as adoption accelerates. Technology leaders who act decisively in 2017 will define the next era of their organization’s technical capabilities.
This analysis reflects the 2017 technology landscape and market conditions. For current guidance on cloud cost optimization, consult with enterprise architects familiar with your specific context and requirements.